Antoine Escoffier vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Dec at 08:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Escoffier vs N. Fatic

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Escoffier 1 - 0 Fatic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Antoine Escoffier winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Antoine Escoffier and Nerman Fatic was at the Qatar F4 (Doha), 05-12-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(8) 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Escoffier | 1 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Qatar F4 (Doha)(12-05-17)
A. Escoffier vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $51,675 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 60.22% (542-358) | Career Total W/L | 58.47% (404-287) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Escoffier vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Antoine Escoffier has demonstrated slightly superior second serve performance, winning 47.94% of points compared to Nerman Fatic's 45.47%. Could this give him an advantage? The correlation suggests a likely edge.
- When it comes to return game performance, Escoffier has a minor lead, capturing 47.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic achieves 46.48%.
- Escoffier slightly outperforms Fatic on first serve returns with 29.18% versus 27.11%. Is this enough to make a significant impact? It may indicate a slight match prediction advantage.
- Under pressure, Escoffier has a small advantage, saving 54.76% of breakpoints compared to Fatic's 53.03%. How might this influence the outcome in tight scenarios?
- In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Fatic has an edge, winning 72.31% of matches, while Escoffier won 46.15%.
- Looking at surface preferences, Escoffier excels on hard courts with a 63% win rate, whereas Fatic performs best on clay with the same win percentage.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Fatic has shown greater success, winning 64.10% compared to Escoffier's 40.63%. This context is crucial for evaluating current form.
- Escoffier leads their head-to-head encounters, winning their only match against Fatic, which was on a hard court.
- Considering opponent quality, Fatic has played against slightly tougher competition, with an average rank of 323.83, as opposed to Escoffier's 375.96.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Fatic has a commanding advantage, winning 81% of such sets versus Escoffier's 33% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (December 22, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to this encounter, both players exhibit unique strengths. Antoine Escoffier shows a slight advantage in specific statistical areas, such as second serve performance and return game effectiveness. These elements could play a vital role in the match's progression.
However, Nerman Fatic's recent form and higher win percentage in deciding sets position him as a formidable opponent. His stronger overall performance over the past year highlights his potential to control the match, particularly under pressure.
Despite Escoffier's previous victory over Fatic in their head-to-head matchup, the current data suggests a different narrative. Fatic's consistency and ability to perform under pressure in the past year might just tilt the scales in his favor.
Considering these factors, Nerman Fatic is the likely winner of this upcoming match. His robust form and mental resilience in deciding moments provide a significant edge in this competitive showdown.
Antoine Escoffier vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Escoffier vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 17 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:58:0 | Average Match Time | 2:58:0 |
| 57% (64/113) | 1st Serve % | 58% (61/106) |
| 73% (47/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (44/61) |
| 49% (24/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (21/45) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (5/13) |
| 39% (41/106) | Return Points Win % | 37% (42/113) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Escoffier Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(4) | ||
SF | L | 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 5-7 6-2 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

A. Escoffier vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.22% (542/358) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 59.04% (1225/850) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 53.69% (10380/8952) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 63.41% (324/187) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 50.00% (46/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 58.68% (169/119) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2967 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2274 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1:18:36 | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 522.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.33 |
| 58% (28231/48326) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 70% (19890/28231) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 49% (9849/20105) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 45% (2337/5208) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 42% (20374/49057) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 17.65% (3/14) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 53.23% (173/152) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 66.06% (362/186) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 61% (536/882) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 13% (1/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 47% (117/247) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 50% (138/277) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 85% (557/475) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 15% (557/81) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 20% (343/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
